Three stages. Three outcomes.
- Exposure
- Gaps
- Evidence
One continuous programme: see where you stand, close gaps, then prove it. Privacy Review covers the in-browser diagnostics on this site; the Privacy Operations Workspace is where records, tasks, and evidence live. Use either surface—or both—as your team prefers.
Start here
Pick one entry—everything below walks through the full arc.
Fastest
Browser check (no account)
Framework-aligned exposure pass; results can feed Workspace diagnostics later.
Start Privacy Exposure CheckSnapshot
Posture & radar
Cross-framework posture view or risk radar—still on this site.
Programme hub
Privacy Operations Workspace
RoPA, compliance tracker, tasks, DSAR/DPIA, reports—Stages 2–3 live here.
Open WorkspaceMore reviews and MODPA tools: Privacy Review catalogue
Identify privacy exposure (Stage 1)
Know exactly which privacy risks pose the greatest exposure.
Use real-time risk scoring, regulatory framework lenses, and enforcement signal context to identify which privacy conditions pose the greatest risk to your organization — across systems, vendors, consent, data flows, and governance gaps.
- Real-time posture scoring with explainable weights
- Risk drivers across consent, retention, access, and transfer
- Regulatory scope mapping (GDPR, CCPA, NIST PF)
- Enforcement signal context — not theoretical scores
Use the Start here choices above for primary CTAs. Stage 1 maps to Privacy Review on this site; guided assessments and deeper diagnostics also run in the Workspace.
Understand Your Compliance Gaps
Know exactly which controls and documentation are needed based on your exposure profile.
Framework-aligned gap analysis that maps your personal data flows, identifies missing controls, and defines exactly what documentation you need — ROPA, DPIAs, consent records, and vendor agreements.
- Article 30 processing register (ROPA)
- DPIA generation aligned to Article 35
- Visual data flow maps across systems & vendors
- Obligation mapping (GDPR / CCPA / NIST PF)
Close the Compliance Gaps
Evidence-based proof of privacy compliance.
Implement prioritized controls, track actions with owners, collect evidence of compliance, and generate audit-ready reports that demonstrate privacy program maturity for regulators, boards, and insurers.
- Risk-driven remediation roadmap with Gantt view
- Evidence collection aligned to real obligations
- Governance Portal — DSAR workflow, intake, and SLA monitoring (e.g. 30-day GDPR / 45-day CCPA)
- Board & DPA-ready reporting
Where Stage 3 happens
Evidence packs, DSAR workflow, vendor register, and remediation all live in the Workspace—one trail for boards, DPAs, and procurement.
- Governance Portal — DSAR intake, workflow, SLA tracking
- Remediation roadmap — owners, due dates, Gantt-style progress
- Reports — board- and regulator-ready summaries
Further reading
How CyberCorrect™ evaluates privacy compliance
How CyberCorrect™ evaluates privacy compliance
CyberCorrect™ does not audit or certify organizations. It evaluates privacy-relevant conditions and applies regulatory context to identify where gaps would amplify exposure or enforcement risk.
Focus on exposure, documentation gaps, and enforcement risk
CyberCorrect™ evaluates conditions that influence regulatory exposure. The methodology prioritizes understanding how a missing control or undocumented process would look under regulator scrutiny — not just whether a policy document exists.
Prioritization based on regulatory and enforcement logic
Prioritization is based on actual enforcement patterns and regulatory guidance, not generic maturity scores. Recommendations are tied to real GDPR/CCPA enforcement scenarios — not abstract compliance checklists.
Transparent, explainable scoring
The assessment logic is designed to be explainable. DPOs and legal teams can understand why specific conditions matter and how they connect to regulatory obligations — making evidence packs defensible, not just presentable.
Regulatory context, not theoretical risk
Regulatory context, not theoretical risk
Privacy regulations evolve faster than internal policies. CyberCorrect™ incorporates current enforcement actions, regulatory guidance, and DPA decisions to ensure assessments reflect real-world compliance expectations.
Emphasis on how regulators investigate and fine
The methodology emphasises how regulators actually investigate — not just "control presence." This enforcement-informed approach ensures assessments identify conditions that matter to real DPA investigations and ICO inquiries.
Evolving regulatory landscape awareness
CyberCorrect™'s evaluation framework is updated to reflect changes in GDPR interpretation, CCPA amendments, EDPB guidelines, and new frameworks like the EU AI Act — ensuring assessments stay relevant as the regulatory landscape shifts.